Re: Development of computer analysis systems
- From: Robert Israel <israel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:45:15 -0500
hrubin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Herman Rubin) writes:
In article <47e36e25@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave <foo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
rjf wrote:
On Mar 20, 7:22 pm, Mike Hansen <mhan...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Are you familiar with the algorithms used by these commands? Is itEspecially when using closed-source software. Even if you wanted to
reasonable
to expect that users be familiar with these algorithms and their
complexity? IMO the answer to the latter question is no.
know the algorithm, you can't do so. Things like this are pretty
ridiculous:http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/WhyYouDoNotUs
uallyN...
--Mike
And in my opinion, fairly arrogant. And consists largely of sentence
fragments. [for example here]
I tend to agree. They could at least be honest and mention the fact they
don't wish to make the algorithms public. My guess is that if Wolfram
find a fast way of solving a particular equation, they are not going to
go knocking on the door of Maplesoft to tell them.
However, when I want them to use an algorithm I know
will work as an intermediate step, it does not get
used. It seems that there is a reluctance to use
integration by parts; Maple has made it worse in
Maple 11, and in any case, it is far more complicated
than using such a common deviced should be.
How has Maple made it worse in Maple 11?
Integration by parts is pretty simple, using Parts in the
IntegrationTools package. For example:
J := int(x*ln(x*sqrt(1+x^2)),x);
/
| 2 1/2
J := | x ln(x (1 + x ) ) dx
|
/
with(IntegrationTools):
Parts(J, ln(x*sqrt(1+x^2)));
2
2 1/2 2 x 2
1/2 ln(x (1 + x ) ) x - ---- + 1/4 ln(1 + x )
2
--
Robert Israel israel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
.
- References:
- Development of computer analysis systems
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: Development of computer analysis systems
- From: Mike Hansen
- Re: Development of computer analysis systems
- From: rjf
- Re: Development of computer analysis systems
- From: Dave
- Re: Development of computer analysis systems
- From: Herman Rubin
- Development of computer analysis systems
- Prev by Date: Re: Development of computer analysis systems
- Next by Date: Re: -- An exact simplification challenge - 55 (MeijerG) - Proud Earthling, go and prove our lifemanship over all the small-minded CASs!
- Previous by thread: Re: Development of computer analysis systems
- Next by thread: Re: Development of computer analysis systems
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|