Re: Is official support for Mathematica on Intel planned forSolaris??

On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:56:12 +0100, Dave wrote:

Baphomet wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:05:25 +0100, Dave wrote:

Comments ????

Sure: read below!


From: Mehran Basti <Basti05b@xxxxxxx> Newsgroups: sci.math.symbolic
Subject: My Final Posting in the NG
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 12:01:30 EDT
Organization: The Math Forum
Lines: 17
Message-ID:
<25603932.1211558520737.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nitrogen.mathforum.org

From: Karen Bindash <KarenBindash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Newsgroups:
sci.math.symbolic
Subject: Is official support for Mathematica on Intel planned for
Solaris?? Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:23:40 EDT
Organization: The Math Forum
Lines: 9
Message-ID:
<4681763.1212585850982.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nitrogen.mathforum.org


I can see the similarity, and the implication

No, you don't.

(Mehran Basti and Karen
Bindash are the same person),

You have missed another name.

but it might be wise not to jump to
conclusions.

To be wise you should have checked out google and posters' names. You
didn't.
Then you should have checked another thing you obviously missed, that
confirms the common source of all messages.

Hint: lf.


That said, Mathematica is an expensive commercial software. Users have all
the rights to bother their support, support they have payed for, in order
to obtain satisfactory answers about installation and possible troubles
they have on their systems.

Asking here for questions like "my Slowlaris installation of latest and
greatest Mathematica 7.77 kernel on my quad-proc cpu with 16Tb ram is
slower than a 286 when integrating x^2" is inappropriate at least.
.

Relevant Pages