Re: Mathematica, Axiom or Maxima?
- From: Thomas Richard <t.richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 04:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
On 2 Sep., 01:21, "Alec Mihailovs" <a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"rjf" <fate...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
CAS don't use the same steps that humans use, much of the time.
Showing "human steps" is an almost entirely separate process.
Yes, but that's what is actually needed for teaching Calculus. The answer in
This is where Maple's Student:-Calculus1:-IntTutor (and the Rule
command
later on) helps. Even if the student presses the "All Steps" button
(or
"Next Step" repeatedly), he can get an idea of what's needed here,
given
that he wants to learn and not just cheat.
--
Thomas Richard
Maple Support
Scientific Computers GmbH
http://www.scientific.de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mathematica, Axiom or Maxima?
- From: Alec Mihailovs
- Re: Mathematica, Axiom or Maxima?
- From: David Park
- Re: Mathematica, Axiom or Maxima?
- References:
- Re: Mathematica, Axiom or Maxima?
- From: Nasser Abbasi
- Re: Mathematica, Axiom or Maxima?
- From: Daniel Lichtblau
- Re: Mathematica, Axiom or Maxima?
- From: Nasser Abbasi
- Re: Mathematica, Axiom or Maxima?
- From: rjf
- Re: Mathematica, Axiom or Maxima?
- From: Alec Mihailovs
- Re: Mathematica, Axiom or Maxima?
- Prev by Date: Re: What is a CAS?
- Next by Date: Re: Solving a parametric family of quintics
- Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica, Axiom or Maxima?
- Next by thread: Re: Mathematica, Axiom or Maxima?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|