Re: proof of the Riemann hypothesis ?

From: Phil Carmody (thefatphil_demunged_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 06/02/04 

Date: 02 Jun 2004 11:01:02 +0300

"Christian Graf" <donotreplyhere@gmx.net> writes:

> temp3600 wrote:
> > I stumbled upon this paper yesterday :
> > http://arxiv.org/abs/math.GM/0405531
                              ||
                              ^^

> > Anyone heard of it ?
>
> On page 2 he says:
> (c_1 - r_1) * ... * (c_n - r_n) = (c_1 - 1) * ... * (c_n -1)
> implies
> r_1 = ... = r_n = 1
> for complex c_i != 0 and real r_i != 0.
>
> Therefore I conclude:
> (2-4)*(3-4) = (2-1)*(3-1)
> implies
> 1=4

Obviously your numbers weren't complex enough.

> In an other paper, Ferreira has proven the denumerability of the real
> numbers. That might indeed be correct if 4 = 1 in his theory.

Who was it who came up with a witty meaning for "GM"?

google...
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Arxiv+GM+Garbage+group:sci.math&lr=&selm=pan.2003.07.27.01.25.52.735414%40math.ucdavis.nospam.edu&rnum=1

Phil 

-- 
1st bug in MS win2k source code found after 20 minutes: scanline.cpp
2nd and 3rd bug found after 10 more minutes: gethost.c
Both non-exploitable. (The 2nd/3rd ones might be, depending on the CRTL)

Relevant Pages