Re: Consecutive ingegers: Coprime
From: Virgil (ITSnetNOTcom/virgil_at_COMCAST.com)
Date: 06/06/04
- Next message: Phil Holman: "Re: Problem"
- Previous message: Virgil: "Re: Problem"
- In reply to: John R Ramsden: "Re: Consecutive ingegers: Coprime"
- Next in thread: Nameless: "Re: Consecutive ingegers: Coprime"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 11:00:45 -0600
In article <e2b6c0lrpdm7qom8m2gij8n0b3nks77jck@4ax.com>,
John R Ramsden <jr@adslate.com> wrote:
> On 28 May 2004 02:56:16 -0700, john_ramsden@sagitta-ps.com (John Ramsden)
> wrote:
> >
> > The number 17 has another interesting property [...]
>
> More in line with the topic of this thread, but in the opposite
> direction, the longest sequence of consecutive integers each
> a product of powers of the same four primes has length 15.
Only if exponents of zero are allowed, since there is no prime which is
a common factor of n and n+1.
>
> If anyone is interested, I have a reference to the paper in
> which this is proved. But to save me the trouble of finding
> it, a search on "stapled sequence" should be sufficient.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> John R Ramsden (jr@adslate.com)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Eternity is a long time, especially towards the end."
> Woody Allen
- Next message: Phil Holman: "Re: Problem"
- Previous message: Virgil: "Re: Problem"
- In reply to: John R Ramsden: "Re: Consecutive ingegers: Coprime"
- Next in thread: Nameless: "Re: Consecutive ingegers: Coprime"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|