Re: entire~~
From: Robin Chapman (rjc_at_ivorynospamtower.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 06/07/04
- Next message: Will Heierman: "Re: A difficult high school maths contest problem."
- Previous message: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: compositing / decomposing numbers"
- In reply to: mina_world: "entire~~"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:56:04 +0100
mina_world wrote:
> hello.....sir~
>
>
> Prove that the function f defined by means of the
>
> equations
>
> f(z) =
>
> (e^z) - 1 when z =/= 0
>
> 1 when z = 0
>
> is entire.
>
Let f be analytic on a domain U. Let a in U and define
g(z) = (f(z) - f(a))/(z - a) for z in U but z =/= a.
= f'(a) if z = a.
Then g is analytic on U. This comes from the basic theory
of removable singularities.
-- Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html "Lacan, Jacques, 79, 91-92; mistakes his penis for a square root, 88-9" Francis Wheen, _How Mumbo-Jumbo Conquered the World_
- Next message: Will Heierman: "Re: A difficult high school maths contest problem."
- Previous message: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: compositing / decomposing numbers"
- In reply to: mina_world: "entire~~"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]