Re: My paranomal data for Summoning

From: |-|erc (gotcha_at_beauty.com)
Date: 06/08/04 

Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:25:03 GMT

"Eric Hocking" <ehocking@LOSE_THIS_BITbtinternet.com> wrote
> > "|-|erc" <gotcha@beauty.com> wrote in
> > This is to be my next application to James Randi.
> <Snipola>
>
> From personal correspondence with him on the subject - he's not interested.
> Not until you can come up with something worth Challenging.

what claim did you discuss with him? the guessing names or summoning?

We spent days detailing my claim how I guess names, then he said "oh I can
guess the name from the message of a post too, just use google" and that was it.

the only way they'll take a shot at putting a quantitative value on subjective results
of the 'power', is if they WANT to, if they already knew I was paranormal, like if
they visited Townsville and joined in the 100,000 witnesses to paranormal now.

subjective results are still easy to test, because some anwers are obviously better
than others (to most people), but to try to prove a supernatural correlation with
that type of data to a skeptic is useless, they take the quickest escape route.

anyone here who put in some effort can prove paranormal within a few days. because
I have 5,000 posts in google and 1000s of replies. The replies are largely paranormal.
The odds of coincidence are trillions to one. All you have to do is use several people
as controls, examine their replies to them in google, examine my replies to me in google,
check if the handle gives away the gist of the post and voila, proof of paranormal.

I did a sample of 50 posts from Jan to Feb 2003, easy to guess half of the names from
several options. Check replies to me on 02/02/2003 especially, 3 1000 to 1 coincidences
all on the one day, what odds is that?

In person I can prove paranormal easily, by opening a book to a random page and
answering any question you ask. They won't bother to look.

This is the simplest proof of paranormal you will ever see, and it takes 3 minutes for anyone
to verify.

----1---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Randi will test you when you properly apply to be tested. Sign up here:

http://www.randi.org/research/challenge.html

----2----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It really all depends on the situation.

----3----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If ever I actually found myself in that situation, I'd hold it upright,
with the intent of attacking my assailant's knife hand.

-----------------
A cliff86
B Rust
C Shanx
D NormDePloom
E Rich Shewmaker
F CNote
G Jeff
H See You In Hell My Friend.
I Someone
J Greg Neill

Which name best fits each post?
You have 1 chance in 1,000 of getting this quiz right by normal means.

Herc

Relevant Pages

  • Re: All languages are equally fit
    ... posts each agent has not yet received. ... Remember that these serial numbers are assigned by Google ... A reply cannot be always *directly* under the post it replies to. ... By the time I start browsing hierarchies of the posts, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Google/Gmail filter off
    ... couple of other news servers nor google. ... can and have posted from aioe (including up to yesterday I saw someone ... It's my fault that he didn't see my replies. ... email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Google/Gmail filter off
    ... I haven't been able to post for months now, neither from aioe ... nor a couple of other news servers nor google. ... Nailing Nashton for his willful ignorance is more than ... It's my fault that he didn't see my replies. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Stop complaining and start taking control of Your life.
    ... Google can't thread properly. ... I don't prefer to insulate myself from life itself. ... I place direct and indirect replies to me ... So now your delusions extend to imagining that you make my lifestyle possible. ...
    (sci.physics)