Re: Choice of topics in math education
From: Gerry Myerson (gerry_at_maths.mq.edi.ai.i2u4email)
Date: 06/09/04
- Next message: Eckard Blumschein: "Re: .999... ?= 1"
- Previous message: Eckard Blumschein: "Re: .999... ?= 1"
- In reply to: David Ames: "Re: Choice of topics in math education"
- Next in thread: Will Twentyman: "Re: Choice of topics in math education"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 16:45:24 +1000
In article <f79f061c.0406080430.1bc50495@posting.google.com>,
worldrecord@juno.com (David Ames) wrote:
> juuitchan@hotmail.com wrote in message
> news:<9159d95e.0406071618.6e17b333@posting.google.com>...
> > 2) Why don't students learn a day-of-week algorithm? This might actually be
> > useful.
>
> This was published at least 60 years ago in Uspensky's book on theory
> of numbers. It is rather complex. Why would anyone bother to learn
> it?
(Heaslett and) Uspensky is not the last word on the topic.
John Conway came up with a nice metod that many people have learned.
He called it the Doomsday method, and you'll find many cites on the web.
-- Gerry Myerson (gerry@maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)
- Next message: Eckard Blumschein: "Re: .999... ?= 1"
- Previous message: Eckard Blumschein: "Re: .999... ?= 1"
- In reply to: David Ames: "Re: Choice of topics in math education"
- Next in thread: Will Twentyman: "Re: Choice of topics in math education"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]