Re: Peano's space-filling curve
From: Robin Chapman (rjc_at_ivorynospamtower.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 06/09/04
- Next message: Robin Chapman: "Re: .999... ?= 1"
- Previous message: Nicolas Ojeda Baer: "Re: semi-local rings"
- In reply to: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 18:35:01 +0100
John Morgan wrote:
>
> OK. so you mentioned bijection. Can you accept that as far
> back as May 19 I had no clear idea of the significance of
> this mention. Back then everyone was telling me; nobody was
> showing me.
Here are the facts:
(i) there is a bijection f : [0,1] -> [0,1]^2,
(ii) there is a continuous surjection g : [0,1] -> [0,1]^2,
(iii) there is no continuous bijection h : [0,1] -> [0,1]^2.
> John
Any relation to Piers?
-- Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html "Lacan, Jacques, 79, 91-92; mistakes his penis for a square root, 88-9" Francis Wheen, _How Mumbo-Jumbo Conquered the World_
- Next message: Robin Chapman: "Re: .999... ?= 1"
- Previous message: Nicolas Ojeda Baer: "Re: semi-local rings"
- In reply to: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|