Re: Peano's space-filling curve
From: Dave Seaman (dseaman_at_no.such.host)
Date: 06/12/04
- Next message: Robert: "Re: Pi Shop"
- Previous message: Lothar Brendel: "Re: .999... ?= 1"
- In reply to: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Next in thread: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Reply: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 14:52:44 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:50:46 +0200, John Morgan wrote:
> Daniel Grubb <grubb@lola.math.niu.edu> wrote in message
> news:caa7t6$e5m$1@news.math.niu.edu...
>>
>>There are two standard approaches: Dedekind cuts, and
>> Cauchy sequences. Both are rather abstract. The
>> essential aspect of both is that 'holes' in the
>> collection of rational numbers have to be 'filled'.
>> They do so in different, but equivalent ways.
> Why_fill_them? I'm happy with rationals that have 'holes',
> because if these 'holes' cause me a problem, I switch to
> reals. If I understand D's cut, which I think I do, it
> assures us that sets of reals can divide into two without
> 'holes'.
That's like saying you are happy to do without computers, because if you
want to go on the Internet you can just use a web browser.
The whole point of "filling the holes" is to *construct* the real
numbers. Without Dedekind cuts (or Cauchy sequences, or some equivalent
construction) we don't have the real numbers at all. We might just
assume they exist, but we can't prove it without doing some work.
-- Dave Seaman Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling. <http://www.commoncouragepress.com/index.cfm?action=book&bookid=228>
- Next message: Robert: "Re: Pi Shop"
- Previous message: Lothar Brendel: "Re: .999... ?= 1"
- In reply to: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Next in thread: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Reply: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|