Re: Peano's space-filling curve
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 06/14/04
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- In reply to: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Next in thread: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Reply: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:03:37 -0300
In <2irinqFqee5iU3@uni-berlin.de>, on 06/10/2004
at 06:34 PM, "John Morgan" <john.morgan@REMOVECAPSataraxie.fr>
said:
>If someone understands a wooden ruler, and knows how to smash it
>into bits, you should have no difficulty giving them at least a feeling
>for the meaning of Lebesgue measure.
There's no connection.
>And the scientific method worked perfectly.
No, because you didn't apply it.
>The data (read sci.math subscribers) failed
>to support this hypothesis
The data supported the hypothesis. You proceeded to replace the data
with what you expected, and rejected the hypothesis on that basis.
Replacing the actual data with imaginary data is not part of the
scientific method.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action. I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.
Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do
not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- In reply to: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Next in thread: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Reply: John Morgan: "Re: Peano's space-filling curve"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|