Re: Factoring paper is wrong
From: Simon Johnson (Ckwop_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/15/04
- Next message: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: Is every symmetric group generated by 2 cycles only?"
- Previous message: Saverio Trioni: "Re: Converting units of measure"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Factoring paper is wrong"
- Next in thread: James Harris: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Reply: James Harris: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Jun 2004 01:40:54 -0700
jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote in message news:<3c65f87.0406131540.6e7ea15d@posting.google.com>...
> My apologies but the paper that I thought solved the factoring problem
> had a dumb mistake in it
I'll invoke the fundamental theorem of mathematicians:
"The quality of a mathematician is inversely proportional to the
number of incorrect proofs they produce."
That makes you decidably amateur. Not that that's a bad thing. I'm an
amateur but don't have delusions of grandeur. You lack the requisite
skill to create an efficient factoring algorithm.
There are only a handful of people in the world with the knowledge to
significantly advance the state of the art and you're not one of them.
Simon.
- Next message: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: Is every symmetric group generated by 2 cycles only?"
- Previous message: Saverio Trioni: "Re: Converting units of measure"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Factoring paper is wrong"
- Next in thread: James Harris: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Reply: James Harris: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|