Re: Factoring paper is wrong
From: Will Twentyman (wtwentyman_at_read.my.sig)
Date: 06/15/04
- Next message: Richard Henry: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Previous message: Agapito Martinez: "Question about compact sets"
- In reply to: James Harris is Nuts: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Next in thread: James Harris is Nuts: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:19:23 -0400
James Harris is Nuts wrote:
> On 15 Jun 2004, Will Twentyman wrote:
> (snip)
>
>
>>I suspect far more people treat him with respect than have respect for
>>him. There is a difference.
>
>
> (snip)
>
> That could explain my perspective that there has been
> too much deference recently to James Harris,
> especially in view of the withdrawn publication.
> Others on this NG proposed errata and counter-
> publication, which frankly ticked me off.
>
Probably so.
>
>
> Will, I guess you missed Harris' latest diatribe of
> today (oh oh, your going on trial, and you'll be
> regulated and the law will against you):
[diatribe snipped]
I vaguely noticed it. I pretty much stopped reading those a while back.
It's easier to avoid responding to ranting if you don't read it in the
first place. My reading habit is to scan over his post, looking for
something resembling math. I read the mathy bits and ignore the rest.
If a thread is devoted to a rant, I often ignore the entire thread.
-- Will Twentyman email: wtwentyman at copper dot net
- Next message: Richard Henry: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Previous message: Agapito Martinez: "Question about compact sets"
- In reply to: James Harris is Nuts: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Next in thread: James Harris is Nuts: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
