Re: Factoring paper is wrong
From: James Harris is Nuts (nuts_at_jsh.com)
Date: 06/15/04
- Next message: Jack Sarfatti: "re: Cosmology Debate May 22, 2004 New Scientist"
- Previous message: Adam: "Re: Axiom of choice in proof for surjectivity"
- Maybe in reply to: James Harris: "Factoring paper is wrong"
- Next in thread: anonymous_at_mathforum.org: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:38:40 +0000 (UTC)
On 15 Jun 2004, James Harris is Nuts wrote:
(snip)
>>>From what I've seen on sci.math over the years,
>the appearance of sincerity is, of course in my
>big fat opinion, a sham.
I meant "the appearance of sincerity of James
Harris" is a sham.
Also, I call Harris' apparent sincerity a sham.
Due to a misplaced ">", I don't want to give
anyon the impression that Quinn is calling it
a sham.
>James Harris is Nuts(TM)
James Harris is Nuts(TM)
James Harris is Nuts(TM)
James Harris is Nuts(TM)
James Harris is Nuts(TM)
.
.
.
to infinity
- Next message: Jack Sarfatti: "re: Cosmology Debate May 22, 2004 New Scientist"
- Previous message: Adam: "Re: Axiom of choice in proof for surjectivity"
- Maybe in reply to: James Harris: "Factoring paper is wrong"
- Next in thread: anonymous_at_mathforum.org: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Loading
