Re: My results, concrete and real
From: George Greene (greeneg_at_greeneg-cs.cs.unc.edu)
Date: 06/17/04
- Next message: Robert Bigdowski: "Re: unit of intelligence"
- Previous message: James Harris: "JSH: Attacking the conclusion"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Re: My results, concrete and real"
- Next in thread: ošin: "Re: My results, concrete and real"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 17 Jun 2004 12:33:00 -0400
jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) writes:
: You have consistently refused to acknowledge the mathematical details
: when I've given them, and insisted on making false claims.
:
: Now you claim you don't have time to consider the actual paper itself?
:
: Too busy just attacking the conclusion?
:
: What about all that time you've spent up to now?
:
: What about that website you created at Hamilton College?
That's a good point.
: So for a while you and your crew got away with it, what makes you
: think that can go on indefinitely?
This:
Even if your results are correct, concrete, and real,
they MAY just not be IMPORTANT.
-- --- The history of our nation has demonstrated that separate is seldom, if ever, equal. --- (Feb.3,2004) Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (4-3), adv.Sen.#2175
- Next message: Robert Bigdowski: "Re: unit of intelligence"
- Previous message: James Harris: "JSH: Attacking the conclusion"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Re: My results, concrete and real"
- Next in thread: ošin: "Re: My results, concrete and real"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]