Re: My results, concrete and real
From: David Kastrup (dak_at_gnu.org)
Date: 06/17/04
- Next message: Georg Friedrich: "Re: A good Q???"
- Previous message: Bob Silverman: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- In reply to: ošin: "Re: My results, concrete and real"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: My results, concrete and real"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 17 Jun 2004 20:32:56 +0200
"ošin" <ošin@ragnarok.com> writes:
> > You can't disprove a proof by attacking the conclusion!
>
> Why not? If someone starts off with your conclusion and proceeds to
> prove it false, why is that not a valid way to show your "proof" is
> trash?
Because it means that it does not make any sense for James to start
over and continue harrassing the Usenet groups with "corrections" and
"now it really works" and so on.
It means he has to move on to some different topic.
-- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Next message: Georg Friedrich: "Re: A good Q???"
- Previous message: Bob Silverman: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- In reply to: ošin: "Re: My results, concrete and real"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: My results, concrete and real"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
