Re: Another twin primes conjecture
From: Lance Lamboy (lance.lamboy_at_lamboy.nospam.com)
Date: 06/19/04
- Next message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: JSH: Attacking the conclusion"
- Previous message: Gregory Magarshak: "Re: Earliest example of an incomputable real"
- In reply to: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Another twin primes conjecture"
- Next in thread: Gib Bogle: "Re: Another twin primes conjecture"
- Reply: Gib Bogle: "Re: Another twin primes conjecture"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 14:52:57 -0400
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:07:39 -0500, David C. Ullrich wrote:
<snip>
>
> And then I spend months explaining that my BS is _not_ just BS, it's
> brand new.
I'm sure your BS is brand new.
> The people who are saying
> it's just BS are evil - they don't care about Truth, they're just trying
> to cover their ass because they're embarrased they can't do as well. I
> claim that my BS is much faster than qsort.
It probably is.
<snip>
>
> Then I finally give up on that. After spending a long time insisting
> that I've invented BS and that it's much faster than qsort, I announce
> that the speed of a sorting algorithm is not important.
Now you are telling us that an algorithm's speed is not important?
> I announce without
> any explanation whatever that studying BS will probably allow people to
> solve the P = NP question.
Crank.
> I _continue_ to insist that my BS will probably lead to a solution to P
> = NP.
Well, let's see it. Put up or shut up.
<snip>
>
> ************************
>
> David C. Ullrich
-- Lance Lamboy "I tell them the truth and they think it's hell." ~ Harry S. Truman
- Next message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: JSH: Attacking the conclusion"
- Previous message: Gregory Magarshak: "Re: Earliest example of an incomputable real"
- In reply to: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Another twin primes conjecture"
- Next in thread: Gib Bogle: "Re: Another twin primes conjecture"
- Reply: Gib Bogle: "Re: Another twin primes conjecture"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
