Re: JSH: Attacking the conclusion
From: James Harris is Nuts (nuts_at_jsh.com)
Date: 06/20/04
- Next message: Quinn Tyler Jackson: "Re: Yeah, I bet James Harris'"
- Previous message: James Harris is Nuts: "Re: Another twin primes conjecture"
- Maybe in reply to: James Harris: "JSH: Attacking the conclusion"
- Next in thread: Quinn Tyler Jackson: "Re: JSH: Attacking the conclusion"
- Reply: Quinn Tyler Jackson: "Re: JSH: Attacking the conclusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 04:59:25 +0000 (UTC)
On 19 Jun 2004, Richard Henry wrote:
>
(snip)
>
>I am assuming that your <knowledge> of this was because it is what James
>told you.
>
Don't forget, Quinn Tyler Jackson is a friend and
booster of James Harris. Perhaps they discussed
it with their "closed list" of "several
mathematicians" (yeah, right).
Watch the evasion from both of them!
James Harris is Nuts(TM)
- Next message: Quinn Tyler Jackson: "Re: Yeah, I bet James Harris'"
- Previous message: James Harris is Nuts: "Re: Another twin primes conjecture"
- Maybe in reply to: James Harris: "JSH: Attacking the conclusion"
- Next in thread: Quinn Tyler Jackson: "Re: JSH: Attacking the conclusion"
- Reply: Quinn Tyler Jackson: "Re: JSH: Attacking the conclusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
