Re: Summation of Reciprocals of Primes
From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo (lhf_at_csgpwr1.uwaterloo.ca)
Date: 06/25/04
- Next message: Robert Israel: "Re: Riesz sequence = isomorphic embedding?"
- Previous message: Matthew Stoker: "Re: Fourier-Bessel Series???"
- In reply to: vernonner3voltazim: "Summation of Reciprocals of Primes"
- Next in thread: The Last Danish Pastry: "Re: Summation of Reciprocals of Primes"
- Reply: The Last Danish Pastry: "Re: Summation of Reciprocals of Primes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 01:40:09 +0000 (UTC)
In article <42336979.0406241633.1e482640@posting.google.com>,
vernonner3voltazim <vnemitz@pinn.net> wrote:
>If those reciprocals are added up, will they converge on a particular value?
>Or will the sum grow forever?
As others have said, it grows forever.
On the other hand, the alternating sum of the reciprocals of primes
does converge (because every alternating series whose terms decrease to
zero converges). Unfortunately, no one knows an expression for the sum.
See
http://www.research.att.com/projects/OEIS?Anum=A078437
This contrasts with the alternating sum of the reciprocals of natural numbers,
which converges to ln(2).
--lhf
- Next message: Robert Israel: "Re: Riesz sequence = isomorphic embedding?"
- Previous message: Matthew Stoker: "Re: Fourier-Bessel Series???"
- In reply to: vernonner3voltazim: "Summation of Reciprocals of Primes"
- Next in thread: The Last Danish Pastry: "Re: Summation of Reciprocals of Primes"
- Reply: The Last Danish Pastry: "Re: Summation of Reciprocals of Primes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|