Re: Summation of Reciprocals of Primes
From: David Einstein (Deinst_at_world.std.com)
Date: 06/25/04
- Next message: Rob Johnson: "Re: entire function"
- Previous message: Donald G. Shead: "Re: "Getting up" momentum"
- In reply to: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: Summation of Reciprocals of Primes"
- Next in thread: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Summation of Reciprocals of Primes"
- Reply: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Summation of Reciprocals of Primes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:44:26 -0500
mareg@mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk wrote:
> In article <19daab49.0406250354.125b7efd@posting.google.com>,
> barr@barrs.org (Michael Barr) writes:
> ...
>
>
>>It sure does, especially given that the sum of the first 200,000,000
>>numbers is a bit less than 20.
>
>
> Now that I find really suprising! Can you sketch the proof?
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Euler-MascheroniConstant.html
>
> Derek Holt.
>
- Next message: Rob Johnson: "Re: entire function"
- Previous message: Donald G. Shead: "Re: "Getting up" momentum"
- In reply to: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: Summation of Reciprocals of Primes"
- Next in thread: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Summation of Reciprocals of Primes"
- Reply: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Summation of Reciprocals of Primes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|