Re: cone domination
From: Matthijs Hebly (heeb_at_iname.com)
Date: 06/30/04
- Next message: Leonard Blackburn: "Re: Rigorous proof of natural numbers' properties (by Edmund Landau)."
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: A little lesson for sqrt(144) year olds."
- Next in thread: Kuba Olejnik: "Re: cone domination"
- Reply: Kuba Olejnik: "Re: cone domination"
- Maybe reply: Rob Pratt: "Re: cone domination"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:16:15 GMT
Kuba Olejnik wrote:
> Have anyone come across the notion of "cone dominated by other cone"?
> Could anyone possibly know what means such a specific notation "ri
> G",where G is a cone?
Sounds like some weird kind of SM to me...
- Next message: Leonard Blackburn: "Re: Rigorous proof of natural numbers' properties (by Edmund Landau)."
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: A little lesson for sqrt(144) year olds."
- Next in thread: Kuba Olejnik: "Re: cone domination"
- Reply: Kuba Olejnik: "Re: cone domination"
- Maybe reply: Rob Pratt: "Re: cone domination"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
