Re: Infintesimals
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 07/01/04
- Next message: David P. Ferguson: "Re: MY LIST of the subsets of N"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Infintesimals"
- Maybe in reply to: Thomas Nordhaus: "Re: Infintesimals"
- Next in thread: David McAnally: "Re: Infintesimals"
- Reply: David McAnally: "Re: Infintesimals"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: Infintesimals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:24:33 -0300
In <40e1f568_1@newsfeed.slurp.net>, on 06/29/2004
at 04:03 PM, "Tralfaz" <tralfaz@emailblackhole.com> said:
>While writing a paper in my philosophy class on Zeno's Paradox, I
>came across a few moder papers "proving" the idea of infintesimals
You can't: you can only define them.
>numbers that are not zero yet are smaller than any positive real
ITYM smaller in absolute value than any standard real.
>Admittedly, if these do in fact exist it would resolve many of the
>issues some people have with infinite series (e.g. 0.999... =1)
No, it doesn't resolve any of them. The issues that they have are
psychological rather than Mathematical.
>Many of the papers I see "prove" these numbers exist by noting that
>if an infinite series converges (like sigma 9x10^(-n))then for any
>finite partial sum, the sum is less than the limit of the sums (1).
>Therefore the sum never "gets to" the limit.
That isn't even wrong.
>This gap is then "filled in"
There is no gap. There is a sequence of partial sums and a limit.
>by infintesimals that have positive magnitude but are not real
What is that supposed to mean? It's just arm waving.
>Given this assumption,
What assumption?
>the fact that 0.999...=1 "proves" infintesimals exist
No.
>My question is: what is the opinion of other mathematicians as to
>the existance of these types of numbers
What types of numbers? Something involving slinging words around
without understanding, or infinitesimals as defined by Mathematicians?
Robinson defined a rigorous concept of infinitesimals decades ago, but
it has nothing to do with mystical gaps.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action. I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.
Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do
not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: David P. Ferguson: "Re: MY LIST of the subsets of N"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Infintesimals"
- Maybe in reply to: Thomas Nordhaus: "Re: Infintesimals"
- Next in thread: David McAnally: "Re: Infintesimals"
- Reply: David McAnally: "Re: Infintesimals"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: Infintesimals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]