Re: mathematicians and longhand arithmetic
From: mathedman (mathedman_at_hotmail.CUT.com)
Date: 07/03/04
- Next message: Chergarj: "Re: mathematicians and longhand arithmetic"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Daryl, Dave, Barb and the Georges' source of Confusion"
- In reply to: Tim923: "mathematicians and longhand arithmetic"
- Next in thread: Chergarj: "Re: mathematicians and longhand arithmetic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 15:15:28 GMT
On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 13:39:03 GMT, Tim923 <tws0923@verizon.net> wrote:
>Lots of people think that because I have a math degree I should be
>outstanding at longhand arithmetic, but I thought that being forced to
>do longhand arithmetic only interferred with doing the more important
>math, such as algebra and calculus. So I'm not that fast or quick
>with longhand arithmetic. Where do the other mathematicians stand?
>Does being poor at arithmetic make a person any less of a
>mathematician?
There is no reason for a good mathematician to be a
good accountant! (nor vice versa!)
- Next message: Chergarj: "Re: mathematicians and longhand arithmetic"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Daryl, Dave, Barb and the Georges' source of Confusion"
- In reply to: Tim923: "mathematicians and longhand arithmetic"
- Next in thread: Chergarj: "Re: mathematicians and longhand arithmetic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|