Re: Infinity can not exist
From: Rob Duncan (robduncan_at_gbronline.com)
Date: 07/04/04
- Next message: Trevor Malcolm: "Re: The Double or One Half Paradox"
- Previous message: George W. Cherry: "Re: Best Calculus Textook for Scientists???"
- In reply to: Michael Varney: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Next in thread: Michael Varney: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Reply: Michael Varney: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 19:56:59 -0700
"Michael Varney" <varney@colorado_no_spam.edu> wrote in message
news:aJBFc.18$UH6.20226@news.uswest.net...
>
> "Rob Duncan" <robduncan@gbronline.com> wrote in message
> news:c_6dnQ2O8fii7HvdRVn-hw@gbronline.com...
> <SNIP>
> >
> > Who cares if the universe stops expanding and then starts contracting?
>
> Physicists. Unlike you, physicists want to understand how the universe
> works.
You have a mental illness where you are incapable of taking statements made
in context and then discussing them in context. You will take a statement
out of context, and then argue it, endlessly... for no reason other than to
satisfy your deep need for conflict and percieved conquest. I have been
alerted as to your behavior and problems. The "Who cares" was obviously in
reference to the forward direction of time.
Rob
(Please, if you want to discuss something, attempt to keep it in context.
Im more than willing to bounce ideas, thoughts, disagreements, philosophies,
back and forth with you in a friendly manner. If you show yourself to be
incapable of polite discourse, I have no use for you.)
- Next message: Trevor Malcolm: "Re: The Double or One Half Paradox"
- Previous message: George W. Cherry: "Re: Best Calculus Textook for Scientists???"
- In reply to: Michael Varney: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Next in thread: Michael Varney: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Reply: Michael Varney: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
