Re: Infinity can not exist
From: Mitchell (macromitch_at_internetCDS.com)
Date: 07/05/04
- Next message: James Stokes: "Weighted Reduced Major Axis Regression"
- Previous message: matmilne: "Fermat's last theorem solved"
- In reply to: Japcuh: "Infinity can not exist"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Reply: Shrikantha S. Shastry: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 4 Jul 2004 18:48:45 -0700
japcuh@gmail.com (Japcuh) wrote in message news:<3a8cbb2e.0407020953.18138c21@posting.google.com>...
> It is impossible for infinity to exist, because in order for infinity
> to exist, everything possible must happen. Including infinity not
> existing. Therefore, it is possible for something to be an extrememly
> large, but not infinite. For it to be infinite, it would have to be
> finite at the same time.
>
> Japcuh
> (Just Another Perl C Unix Hacker)
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.htm#what_is
> .O.
> ..O
> OOO
There is no such thing as an infinite quantity.
Infinity and the infinitesimal are only mathematical tools.
Continuity is the bridge of the finite to the infinite.
You must go through the finite before you can reach the infinite.
Singularities in physics suffer from that problem. They claim to
go from the finite to the infinite physically:as space-time curvature.
Not possible.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls --
- Next message: James Stokes: "Weighted Reduced Major Axis Regression"
- Previous message: matmilne: "Fermat's last theorem solved"
- In reply to: Japcuh: "Infinity can not exist"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Reply: Shrikantha S. Shastry: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
