Re: proof of monotheism without a flaw
From: Craig Feinstein (cafeinst_at_msn.com)
Date: 07/09/04
- Next message: Michael Varney: "Re: Classical, theoretical physics"
- Previous message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- In reply to: Bellview Hospital: "Re: proof of monotheism without a flaw"
- Next in thread: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: proof of monotheism without a flaw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Jul 2004 20:01:08 -0700
"Bellview Hospital" <afropop@binkysnoty.com> wrote in message news:<2l3n8mF7mragU1@uni-berlin.de>...
> You are using man made logic, not God's logic. He could have created
> himself in another space or universe in different form, like Microsoft did
> going from Win 95 to Win 98.
> You also assume that he cannot upgrade himself, why not? In human terms,
> please.
I can only use man-made logic, because I am a man and I'm not God. Of
course He can upgrade Himself if He wants, as He can do anything. But
this would contradict the generally accepted assumption about God that
the God that exists now is the same God that created the universe.
Craig
- Next message: Michael Varney: "Re: Classical, theoretical physics"
- Previous message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- In reply to: Bellview Hospital: "Re: proof of monotheism without a flaw"
- Next in thread: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: proof of monotheism without a flaw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
