Re: plausibility argument (sefara) for twin primes conjecture
From: KRamsay (kramsay_at_aol.com)
Date: 07/11/04
- Next message: herschko_at_rutcor.rutgers.edu: "Re: Sets of functions"
- Previous message: Virgil: "Re: Now somebody tell me that Robin Chapman isn't a troll again?!"
- In reply to: Chan-Ho Suh: "Re: plausibility argument (sefara) for twin primes conjecture"
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: plausibility argument (sefara) for twin primes conjecture"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 11 Jul 2004 02:48:00 GMT
In article <080720042328515015%suh@math.ucdavis.nospam.edu>, Chan-Ho Suh
<suh@math.ucdavis.nospam.edu> writes:
|I don't like this example because it's one of those examples where what
|people are thinking and saying are two different things. When a layman
|hears or says "continuous curve" s/he has a particular idea of
|something, usually a very tame kind of curve for which the intuition is
|correct in asserting it "cannot fill a region of space". This is more
|of an example of miscommunication rather than a case of intuition
|leading one astray.
People seem to have the same intuition, though, even after having
been given a rigorous definition.
The fact that it's possible to have an informal notion like this without
a definition in mind is one reason for pursuing informal arguments
like the original poster mentioned. It's also a reason why it's useful
to go beyond them, because one can study curves in an informal
way for a long time before you realize there's any such thing as
what we call a space-filling curve (whether it's the kind of thing you
had in mind by a "curve" or not). Having to say what additional
properties you mean to assume of your "nice smooth" curves adds
to the clarity of the exposition of their properties.
Keith Ramsay
- Next message: herschko_at_rutcor.rutgers.edu: "Re: Sets of functions"
- Previous message: Virgil: "Re: Now somebody tell me that Robin Chapman isn't a troll again?!"
- In reply to: Chan-Ho Suh: "Re: plausibility argument (sefara) for twin primes conjecture"
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: plausibility argument (sefara) for twin primes conjecture"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|