Re: JSH: Sweep likely

From: James Harris (jstevh_at_msn.com)
Date: 07/12/04 

Date: 12 Jul 2004 05:11:11 -0700

"flip" <flip_alpha@safebunch.com> wrote in message news:<1089610198.444545@news-1.nethere.net>...
> "James Harris" <jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3c65f87.0407111904.23749a0b@posting.google.com...
> > I feel confident that Ullrich and Magidin in particular have behaved
> > in a way that will mean the loss of their Ph.D's.
>
> Mr. Harris,
>
> when you are proven wrong (once again, for the millionth time), will it mean
> the loss of your welfare BS in physics?
>
> Obviously, you are not deserving of any degree as you haven't any emotional
> or scientific intelligence!
>
> You should feel so embarrassed with yourself for even making such a claim.
>
> You may also consider seeing a doctor as you seem to be allowing the desire
> for glory distort just how wrong you continue to be.
>
> You might end up in a straight jacket before it is all said and done.

Remember, I'm not talking about something vague here, as I'm talking
about publication.

Call me crazy if you wish as it won't make any difference.

All the little social games that seemed to work on sci.math, never
did, as I've just been busily researching, refining my results, and
writing papers.

It can just take a while with math research. Some of that refinement
of my results can be seen by just looking over posts where I would
argue out different areas with posters just to see if there wasn't
something I missed, despite all the insults being tossed at me.

I kept at it despite the social flak. Math is important. Social
issues come and go.

Now I've finally sent off the major papers, including re-sending APF
for yet another round of formal peer review, which is extra work for
some mathematicians required by sci.math posters who interfered with
the journal process.

So sci.math will pay, and so will posters who acted in a way that I'll
show is gross fraud, requiring that they be stripped of their Ph.D's.

The initial repudiation of this group, and of those posters will come
from journals.

Then the rest of the impact should come from the math community
itself, as it moves to clean house, and try to make sure that
something like this never happens again.

Mathematicians who post on newsgroups need to understand that the
rules still apply. There is still a code of ethics that you can be
held accountable too.

And your Ph.D is not a permanent gift. It is earned, and can be
unearned.

James Harris

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Sweep likely
    ... James Harris wrote: ... >argue out different areas with posters just to see if there wasn't ... Math is important. ... >the journal process. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Final exam
    ... Here readers can get a good dose of pseudo-math from one the most ... And he lies about math. ... to believe just about anything as long as posters disagree with me. ... You are being taught false information, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: More math stuff, truth and social reality
    ... > the math people have basically set up one criteria to block the proofs: ... Assuming you have the truth, denial is indeed wrong and indeed foolish. ... people don't seem to be requesting you to provide an algorithm that factors ... If you have, indeed, provided one which these posters ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
    ... is not a hard problem after all, then how can mathematicians who not ... Posters on sci.math then declared that the journal system was flawed ... and that math journals routinely publish false papers!!! ... of their own--like killing a math journal. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
    ... is not a hard problem after all, then how can mathematicians who not ... Posters on sci.math then declared that the journal system was flawed ... and that math journals routinely publish false papers!!! ... of their own--like killing a math journal. ...
    (sci.math)