Re: Anyone want to work for Google?
From: Phil Carmody (thefatphil_demunged_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 07/12/04
- Next message: Phil Carmody: "Re: Anyone want to work for Google?"
- Previous message: Ish: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- In reply to: Robin Chapman: "Re: Anyone want to work for Google?"
- Next in thread: David Kastrup: "Re: Anyone want to work for Google?"
- Reply: David Kastrup: "Re: Anyone want to work for Google?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 12 Jul 2004 16:52:44 +0300
Robin Chapman <rjc@ivorynospamtower.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
> > Upon making it to the second level of questioning, that is if you are
> > able to, you are hit up with this question as seen on 7427466391.com:
> >
> > f(1)= 7182818284
>
> digits 1-10 of the decimal expansion of exp(1)
You zero-counter you!
I'd say the first digit of the decimal expansion e was '2'
So that 7 is the 2nd digit.
> > f(2)= 8182845904
>
> digits 5-14 of the decimal expansion of exp(1)
6
> > f(3)= 8747135266
>
> digits 23-32 of the decimal expansion of exp(1)
24
Ooh, ooh, factorial?
> > f(4)= 7427466391
>
> digits 99-108 of the decimal expansion of exp(1)
100
bugger.
> > f(5)= __________
>
> some early length-10 block of digits in the decimal
> expansion of exp(1)?
I thought this was tempting:
1 | index(f(1))
2 | index(f(2))
3 | index(f(3))
4 | index(f(4))
Alas, it's useless, and doesn't hold true again until f(10) at index 430,
f(32) at 1120, and f(43) at 1419.
Phil
-- 1st bug in MS win2k source code found after 20 minutes: scanline.cpp 2nd and 3rd bug found after 10 more minutes: gethost.c Both non-exploitable. (The 2nd/3rd ones might be, depending on the CRTL)
- Next message: Phil Carmody: "Re: Anyone want to work for Google?"
- Previous message: Ish: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- In reply to: Robin Chapman: "Re: Anyone want to work for Google?"
- Next in thread: David Kastrup: "Re: Anyone want to work for Google?"
- Reply: David Kastrup: "Re: Anyone want to work for Google?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|