Re: JSH: Sweep likely
From: C. Bond (cbond_at_ix.netcom.com)
Date: 07/12/04
- Next message: Craig Feinstein: "Svara that Goldbach's Conjecture is Unprovable"
- Previous message: Pyriform: "Re: Atheist MorituriMax"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Re: JSH: Sweep likely"
- Next in thread: a: "Re: JSH: Sweep likely"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:58:37 GMT
James Harris wrote:
[snip]
> Call me crazy if you wish as it won't make any difference.
Of course not! Identifying the errors in your arguments and noting your passionate defense of both
the original errors and any later corrections has made no difference. Disproving your arguments and
posting counter-examples has made no difference, either.
[snip]
> It can just take a while with math research. Some of that refinement
> of my results can be seen by just looking over posts where I would
> argue out different areas with posters just to see if there wasn't
> something I missed, despite all the insults being tossed at me.
Insults are cheap shots -- from you or your critics. But identifying you as an *idiot* or a *crank*
is not insulting, it is precision labelling analogous to 'truth in packaging'.
[snip]
> The initial repudiation of this group, and of those posters will come
> from journals.
And if they reject your papers???
> James "Often in error, but never in doubt!" Harris
-- There are two things you must never attempt to prove: the unprovable -- and the obvious. -- Democracy: The triumph of popularity over principle. -- http://www.crbond.com
- Next message: Craig Feinstein: "Svara that Goldbach's Conjecture is Unprovable"
- Previous message: Pyriform: "Re: Atheist MorituriMax"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Re: JSH: Sweep likely"
- Next in thread: a: "Re: JSH: Sweep likely"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|