Re: Tensors for mathematicians
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 07/12/04
- Next message: Craig Feinstein: "Re: Svara that the Twin Primes Conjecture is Unprovable"
- Previous message: The Last Danish Pastry: "Re: JSH: Sweep likely"
- In reply to: J Jensen: "Re: Tensors for mathematicians"
- Next in thread: puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Tensors for mathematicians"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:07:19 -0300
In <c3f2060d.0407111049.5d2d86a0@posting.google.com>, on 07/11/2004
at 11:49 AM, jjensen14@hotmail.com (J Jensen) said:
>So what you are saying is that a tensor takes a base point x in the
>manifold M, and then is a multi-linear map of say n vectors from T_x
>M
Or, more generally, r vectors from T_x and s vectors from T^*_x.
>but bringing in the full machinery of GR
He wasn't talking about doing that; he was doing exactly what the OP
requested, giving an explanation oriented to mathematicians rather
than physicists. GR involves quite a bit more than just definig
tensors.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: Craig Feinstein: "Re: Svara that the Twin Primes Conjecture is Unprovable"
- Previous message: The Last Danish Pastry: "Re: JSH: Sweep likely"
- In reply to: J Jensen: "Re: Tensors for mathematicians"
- Next in thread: puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Tensors for mathematicians"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|