Re: You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ...
From: Eckard Blumschein (blumschein_at_et.uni-magdeburg.de)
Date: 07/13/04
- Next message: Chairman of the Ozzy Osbourne Appreciation Society: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: the more likely sweep"
- In reply to: Joseph Hertzlinger: "You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ..."
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ..."
- Reply: Robin Chapman: "Re: You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:50:31 +0100
Old chaps and chapmans, perhaps you are not crazy enough altogether.
A behavior that does not please Robert Bagula and even the repetitious
use of the word penis does not suffice as evidence for your excellence.
Instead you might vote YES for 1/oo=0, tell something really original,
or at least lurk for someone who is both a professor who is obviously
wrong and someone who managed to cheat TV teams, editors and even less
critical stuff. Just a hint: Superluminality by Nimtz has a profound
mathematical fallacy-background. Doesn't it?
Eckard Blumschein
- Next message: Chairman of the Ozzy Osbourne Appreciation Society: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: the more likely sweep"
- In reply to: Joseph Hertzlinger: "You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ..."
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ..."
- Reply: Robin Chapman: "Re: You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]