Re: You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ...
From: Van Jacques (calccurve-test23_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/13/04
- Next message: Michael Jørgensen: "OT: Loyalty towards employer. Re: Anyone want to work for Google?"
- Previous message: Thomas Mautsch: "Re: Count the number of ones in binary rapresentation of n"
- Maybe in reply to: Joseph Hertzlinger: "You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ..."
- Next in thread: Will Twentyman: "Re: You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 13 Jul 2004 06:11:05 -0700
LOL. Its true! As one who spent some time in the nuthouse myself,
I can vouch for it from experience. And some of the people I worked
with were crazier than me.
One of my first experiences with faculty; our institute (HAO/NCAR)
had nominations for the best paper that year by someone at the
institute.
I nominated someone who had written a paper that had clarified
things for me.
When my neighbor, who had been on my thesis committee when I was
doing my thesis, found out, he came in very angry, wondering
why I had not nominated his paper.
This is the same guy who had said that my thesis was a rehash of
his research--which was not true, not by a long shot.
Oh well. I guess it takes all kinds.
Van
Robin Chapman wrote:
> Eckard Blumschein wrote:
>
> > A behavior
>
> Behaviour
>
> --
> Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html
> "Lacan, Jacques, 79, 91-92; mistakes his penis for a square root,
88-9"
> Francis Wheen, _How Mumbo-Jumbo Conquered the World_
- Next message: Michael Jørgensen: "OT: Loyalty towards employer. Re: Anyone want to work for Google?"
- Previous message: Thomas Mautsch: "Re: Count the number of ones in binary rapresentation of n"
- Maybe in reply to: Joseph Hertzlinger: "You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ..."
- Next in thread: Will Twentyman: "Re: You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]