Re: You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ...

From: Eckard Blumschein (blumschein_at_et.uni-magdeburg.de)
Date: 07/14/04 

Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:35:45 +0100

Robin Chapman wrote:

> You have posted no mathematical fallacies, and vanishly little
> of mathematical revalance.

I wrote: Superluminality by Nimtz has a profound mathematical
fallacy-background.

I guess you meant relevance.