Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?
From: Cassandra Thompson (cass.harley_at_bigpond.com)
Date: 07/15/04
- Next message: Kedi: "How to minimize the absolute sum in curve fitting?"
- Previous message: Eric Gisse: "Re: Now I ask you:"
- Next in thread: Rouben Rostamian: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: Rouben Rostamian: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: Jeremy Targett: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: Robin Chapman: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: Narasimham G.L.: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: Ken Oliver: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: James Dolan: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 02:57:23 GMT
I am learning trigonometry in preperation for actually teaching it.
I am enjoying it, and would like to think I am getting a good
understanding, however I am unsure about hte following.
When talking about highschool level trigonometry we often use
'SOHCAHTOA' as a way to remember that:
Sin@ = O/H
Cos@ = A/H
Tan@ = O/A
Further on we learn that 3 other functions exist that are the inversion
of the first three
CSC@ = H/O
SEC@ = H/A
COT@ = A/O
So that Sin@ = 1/CSC@
Cos@ = 1/SEC@
Tan@ = 1/COT@
My question is why is the cofunction of Sin, ie Cosine placed in the
first three that are learnt. Wouldn't it make more sense to group them as
Sin@ = O/H
Sec@ = H/A
Tan@ = O/A
Then introduce the cofunctions
Cos@ = A/H
CSC@ = H/O
Cot@ = A/O
This seems alot more clear to me. Is there some mathematical reason that
I am missing?
Kind Regards,
Cassandra Thompson
- Next message: Kedi: "How to minimize the absolute sum in curve fitting?"
- Previous message: Eric Gisse: "Re: Now I ask you:"
- Next in thread: Rouben Rostamian: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: Rouben Rostamian: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: Jeremy Targett: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: Robin Chapman: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: Narasimham G.L.: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: Ken Oliver: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Reply: James Dolan: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|