Re: Two kinds; three measures
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 07/15/04
- Next message: David Bernier: "Re: You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ..."
- Previous message: Gene Nygaard: "Re: Two kinds; three measures"
- In reply to: Donald G. Shead: "Two kinds; three measures"
- Next in thread: Gene Nygaard: "Re: Two kinds; three measures"
- Reply: Gene Nygaard: "Re: Two kinds; three measures"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:30:27 -0500
"Donald G. Shead" wrote:
>
> Dispite what the kooky International System of Weights and Measures
> advocates: We only need two kinds, or states of motion, and three
> measures of quantities in the science of physics:
[snip crap]
Seven fundamental quantities, fucking imbecile Dumb Donny
shitHead.
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
<http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html>
<http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html>
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: David Bernier: "Re: You Don't Have to Be Nuts to Be a Mathematician ..."
- Previous message: Gene Nygaard: "Re: Two kinds; three measures"
- In reply to: Donald G. Shead: "Two kinds; three measures"
- Next in thread: Gene Nygaard: "Re: Two kinds; three measures"
- Reply: Gene Nygaard: "Re: Two kinds; three measures"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Loading