Re: Number theory

From: Eckard Blumschein (blumschein_at_et.uni-magdeburg.de)
Date: 07/16/04 

Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:25:27 +0100

I didn't realize Nissim posting his doubts here so far. Why?
Why seems there to be a huge record of similar doubts?
Why isn't there a pertaining FAQ?
Do you really treat an EE student as he deserves it?
Maybe, Nissim is not ready just to enjoy you.
Maybe, he is not even familiar with <>.
Wouldn't it be helpful if you could briefly explain that Weierstrass's
epsilon-delta notion deviates from what non-mathematicians necessarily
associate with infinity?
Maybe, arrogance and sarcasm of experts like Robin Chapman is a telltale
indication of their own carefulls hidden doubts?
I will utter my "doubts" arising from decades of practice in the thread
by Joseph Hertzlinger 13.07.04: You Don't Have to Be Nuts..."

Eckard Blumschein

>>>I am an electrical engineering student.I am learning number theory by
>>>myself.I want to know if there is a separate number theory sci.math
>>>group or do I post my doubts here.
>>>Thanks,
>>>Nissim.
>>
>>Post your doubts (especially the Cantor doubts) here! Everyone here
>>is so charming and helpful when it comes to doubts (especially Cantor
>>diagonal proof doubts). Also, any simple proofs of FLT are very well
>>accepted.
>>
Peter Webb wrote:

> And proofs that 0.999... <> 1.
>
> We all love that one as well.

Quantcast