Re: can you find the limit of this function?

From: Virgil (ITSnetNOTcom#virgil_at_COMCAST.com)
Date: 07/16/04


Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 02:19:43 -0600

In article <baa549eb.0407152255.2b987562@posting.google.com>,
 max1974isome@hotmail.com (Max) wrote:

> Brute force calculating gives the limit of
>
> h
> 3 - 1
> -------
> h
>
> as approximately 1.09 when h approaches 0.
>
> How can I find that algebraically without
> calculus?
>
> Using the squeezing theorem I was able to
> confirm its range between 1 and 1.2817
> (= 4-e). But that's as close as I can get.
>
> any ideas for an exact answer?
>
> thanks,
> Max Schmeder
>
> (to reply by email, remove the year from my address)

Since 3^0 = 1, you have (3^h - 3^0)/h, whose limit will be the
derivative of 3^x with respect to x, evaluated at x = 0, which is ln(3).



Relevant Pages

  • Re: can you find the limit of this function?
    ... > Using the squeezing theorem I was able to ... > any ideas for an exact answer? ... WITHOUT calculus? ... --Ron Bruck ...
    (sci.math)
  • can you find the limit of this function?
    ... Using the squeezing theorem I was able to ... any ideas for an exact answer? ... Max Schmeder ...
    (sci.math)
  • limit of this function?
    ... Using the squeezing theorem I was able to ... any ideas for an exact answer? ... Max Schmeder ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Why relativists dont understand Einsteins 1905 mathematics.
    ... There is no "exact value", there is always another term in the series ... Having long ago looked up Taylor Expansion on the Internet, ... introduction of a Taylor Expansion - which IS calculus - to SHOW ... nor how gravity works nor what electricity is - they say "electricity ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Infinite precision floating-point
    ... josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx schrieb: ... something we invented to describe "something that gets very small or exact". ... Giving up calculus because it isn't "real" is almost the opposite of what should be done: better to give up reality, ... This then stands for any irrational number, but unlike Pi or e we can't express them with an algorithm, as this algorithm would have to be as long as the row of decimal places - but in that fact the best algorithm would be just enumbering all digits of the number. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)