Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?
From: Narasimham G.L. (mathma18_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/17/04
- Next message: Dr. Flonkenstein: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Previous message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Cosmos is a gigantic VonNeumann Game of gametheory; so who are its players?? Re: whether economics is zero-sum"
- In reply to: James Dolan: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Next in thread: Dr. Flonkenstein: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 17 Jul 2004 11:39:15 -0700
jdolan@math-cl-n03.math.ucr.edu (James Dolan) wrote in message news:<cd716d$sji$1@glue.ucr.edu>...
> in article <nomjc.1663$K53.873@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
> cassandra thompson <cass.harley@bigpond.com> wrote:
...
> the name "trigonometry" suggests that the subject is all about
> triangles, but that's very misleading; what trigonometry secretly
> _really_ is is the study of the points on the unit circle. ...
The word is derived from Sanskrit. Tri- for three, Gono- for Kona or
angle,(gonio-meter for angle measurement) metry from Matra or
measure or unit. Essentially angular rotation is measured in the
first step, as ratios of side lengths around the triangle.
To drive this home, teaching of sin/cos/tan should be done
simultaneously or concurrently with the definition of a radian, as 2
Pi radians for one full rotation, as the central wedge angle of sector
of a circle.
- Next message: Dr. Flonkenstein: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Previous message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Cosmos is a gigantic VonNeumann Game of gametheory; so who are its players?? Re: whether economics is zero-sum"
- In reply to: James Dolan: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Next in thread: Dr. Flonkenstein: "Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]