Re: normal subgroup
mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk
Date: 07/20/04
- Next message: Julien Santini: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Previous message: Robert Silverman: "Re: Length of sequence of consecutive primes starting at 2"
- In reply to: Julien Santini: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Next in thread: Julien Santini: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Reply: Julien Santini: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:30:03 +0000 (UTC)
In article <cdj6la$jvg$1@news-reader2.wanadoo.fr>,
"Julien Santini" <santini.julien@wanadoo.fr> writes:
>> let G be a finite group . let H be asubgroup of G and let N be a normal
>subgroup of G .prove that if |H| and |G:N| are relatively prime . Then H is
>a subgroup of N .
>>
>
>|N| = sum(p_i^k_i, i = 1..n) where n is a positive integer, p_i are distinct
>prime numbers and k_i are positive integers. (the case |N|=1 being trivial)
>For each i, there is only a single p_i-Sylow subgroup in N (because N is
>normal, whence each of its Sylow subgroups is normal too).
That does not follow! According to that argument, every Sylow subgroup of
every finite group G is normal - just take N = G.
Derek Holt.
>Now take an element h in H. We know that its order is of the form:
>sum(p_i^o_i, i =1..n) where o_i are nonnegative integers. Also, the
>generated subgroup <h> is cyclic, hence abelian, and the direct sum of its
>Sylow subgroups. But any p_i-group of G must be contained in a p_i-Sylow of
>G, and the p_i-Sylows are uniquely determined, whence the p_i-Sylows of <h>
>are contained in those of N, and <h> is contained in N. In particular, h is
>in N.
>
>--
>Julien Santini
>
>
>
- Next message: Julien Santini: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Previous message: Robert Silverman: "Re: Length of sequence of consecutive primes starting at 2"
- In reply to: Julien Santini: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Next in thread: Julien Santini: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Reply: Julien Santini: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|