Re: normal subgroup
From: Julien Santini (santini.julien_at_wanadoo.fr)
Date: 07/20/04
- Next message: ArtflDodgr: "Re: Ito integration"
- Previous message: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: normal subgroup"
- In reply to: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:37:42 +0200
> That does not follow! According to that argument, every Sylow subgroup of
> every finite group G is normal - just take N = G.
>
> Derek Holt.
Arggggh ! Thanks for pointing it out; I was first convinced that D.U's proof
was really easier, and now I realize that mine was totally wrong. One day,
I'll have the last laugh ... till that day ...
-- Julien Santini
- Next message: ArtflDodgr: "Re: Ito integration"
- Previous message: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: normal subgroup"
- In reply to: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: normal subgroup"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]