Re: Cold Fusion

From: Tom Potter (tdp_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 07/25/04 

Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:49:35 +0800

"Pyriform" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:41019dab$0$6441$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com...
> Tom Potter wrote:
> > And hopefully, if the sociopaths come around
> > to comprehending what they are doing,
> > and begin to act civilized,
> > I can also discuss some physics.
>
> How could you possibly do that? You don't know any physics.

Here's a physics concept for you to chew on:
( If you have the intelligence,
and the knowledge of physics
to comprehend it.)

Imagine a hierarchy of objects as follows:
1. Null
2. Particle
3. Nucleus
4. Atom
5. Molecule
6. Aggregate

And next imagine a field associated with each
object hierarchy has an intensity that is a function of the
number of the contiguous objects in that class.
1. F(0) - Null ( Space field "1" )
2. F(1) - Particle ( Weak force field )
3. F(2) - Nucleus ( Magnetic field "H" )
4. F(3) - Atom ( Electric field "D" )
5. F(4) - Molecule ( So-called molecular forces field)
6. F(5) - Aggregate ( Gravitational field "G" )

And next imagine that other objects
of the same class are affected by this field,
and have a physical property "P(N)".
1. P(0) - Null ( Distance "Space^0 and space^5" )
2. P(1) - Particle ( Unnamed weak force property)
3. P(2) - Nucleus ( Magnetic Moment )
4. P(3) - Atom ( Charge )
5. P(4) - Molecule ( Unnamed molecular force property)
6. P(5) - Aggregate ( Unnamed, mass-related, gravitational property )

You will find that the following principles apply to such a system:

1. The objects of each class "diffuse"
from the preceding higher order class
("diffusity" has the property of area per unit time) such that:

P(N) * diffusity = P(N-1)

Aggregate -> molecule -> atom -> nucleus -> particle -> space^5

2. F(N)^N * space^N * frequency^N = 1

3. F(N) * P(N) = space^(5-N)

4. The aggregate field F(5) and
the aggregate property P(5) have the same physical dimensions.
(Accounts for gravity being different from the other forces.)

5. Space(0) = space(5) = 1

I suggest that "N" could be extended beyond "5",
in which case, additional fields and properties would have to be
inserted between molecules and what I have called the "aggregate",
and that additional spaces beyond "5" would have to be applied
to accommodate the other object classes, such as solar systems,
galaxies, etc. 

--
Tom Potter     http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cold Fusion
    ... >> to comprehending what they are doing, ... You don't know any physics. ... The aggregate field Fand ... Tom Potter ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Cold Fusion
    ... Tom Potter wrote: ... if the sociopaths come around ... > to comprehending what they are doing, ... You don't know any physics. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Rigorous definition of Plancks Constant
    ... >> seem to be more interested in my views on physics, ... Two bodies interact about a common point in a common time. ... I must point out to Uncle Al, ... Tom Potter ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??
    ... Tom Potter wrote: ... > who headed the Washington University Physics department. ... Indeed, I wonder how many welfare physicists, con artists, charlatans ... > and observing rats at work in sci.physics, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??
    ... Tom Potter wrote: ... > who headed the Washington University Physics department. ... Indeed, I wonder how many welfare physicists, con artists, charlatans ... > and observing rats at work in sci.physics, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)