Re: "Embedded" in the plane.
From: Mitch Harris (harrisq_at_tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de)
Date: 07/25/04
- Next message: Anno Siegel: "Re: A model for the natural numbers"
- Previous message: Prai Jei: "Re: Cold Fusion"
- Maybe in reply to: Lee Rudolph: "Re: "Embedded" in the plane."
- Next in thread: W. Dale Hall: "Re: "Embedded" in the plane."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Jul 2004 18:36:19 GMT
Bill Jones <bill_jones92057@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Doesn't 'embedded' in the plane connote some thickness to the plane?
Why would it?
Mitch
- Next message: Anno Siegel: "Re: A model for the natural numbers"
- Previous message: Prai Jei: "Re: Cold Fusion"
- Maybe in reply to: Lee Rudolph: "Re: "Embedded" in the plane."
- Next in thread: W. Dale Hall: "Re: "Embedded" in the plane."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
