Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent
From: Daniel McLaury (daniel_mcl_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/29/04
- Next message: Kavender: "the optimum values of x to maximize determinant of Fisher information"
- Previous message: vernonner3voltazim: "Re: Vernon's Prime Sieve"
- In reply to: Van Jacques: "Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent"
- Next in thread: Poker Joker: "Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Jul 2004 22:27:15 -0700
Guys, why do you even talk to people like this? Some people are unable
to accept the axiomatic nature of mathematics and wish to proceed from
some intuitive understanding; more often than not they cannot be
reasoned with. Seriously, these discussions should be crossposted to
alt.metaphysics.pyramid-power or something and let die.
- Next message: Kavender: "the optimum values of x to maximize determinant of Fisher information"
- Previous message: vernonner3voltazim: "Re: Vernon's Prime Sieve"
- In reply to: Van Jacques: "Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent"
- Next in thread: Poker Joker: "Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
