publication problem
From: Geoff (geoff_at_romail.ru)
Date: 07/31/04
- Next message: Poker Joker: "Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent"
- Previous message: Roger Bagula: "Re: [Ancient_Egypt_Group] The rise and fall of civilizations"
- Next in thread: Arturo Magidin: "Re: publication problem"
- Reply: Arturo Magidin: "Re: publication problem"
- Reply: John T Lowry: "Re: publication problem"
- Reply: Stephen Montgomery-Smith: "Re: publication problem"
- Reply: Nora Baron: "Re: publication problem"
- Reply: David Bandel: "Re: publication problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 21:50:18 GMT
Hi,
Recently i wrote a paper, but i have discovered an error in one of my
proofs. Unfortunately, a lot of the results and conclusions i made were
based on that erroneous proof, so there's not much good about the paper
left.
I'm not sure what to do... can I still make adjustments to the paper once
it has been published, perhaps to the online version? Should i leave it
the way it is, and hope that noone reads it? ...
I need your advice
Thanks
Geoff
- Next message: Poker Joker: "Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent"
- Previous message: Roger Bagula: "Re: [Ancient_Egypt_Group] The rise and fall of civilizations"
- Next in thread: Arturo Magidin: "Re: publication problem"
- Reply: Arturo Magidin: "Re: publication problem"
- Reply: John T Lowry: "Re: publication problem"
- Reply: Stephen Montgomery-Smith: "Re: publication problem"
- Reply: Nora Baron: "Re: publication problem"
- Reply: David Bandel: "Re: publication problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|