Re: About the evidence and relativity
From: Eric Gisse (fseggNOSPAM_at_uaf.edu)
Date: 08/01/04
- Next message: No Way: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Previous message: David Kastrup: "Re: Self-teaching of integration methods"
- In reply to: Tom Potter: "Re: About the evidence and relativity"
- Next in thread: Tom Potter: "Re: About the evidence and relativity"
- Reply: Tom Potter: "Re: About the evidence and relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 07:28:26 -0800
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 22:16:51 +0800, "Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net>
wrote:
[snip]
>> Look!
>>
>> http://www.space.com/news/cosmic_shear_000512.html
>>
>> Don't be stupid.
>
>Excerpt from the 4 year old NEWS article.
Oh god, scientific research that is 4 years old! THROW IT OUT. Fucking
hell.
>"At the same time, astronomers admit that their new method for finding dark
>matter has not yet been tested enough to allow experts to make a definitive
>generalization about the fate of the universe. "Since our approach is new,
>it's not very precise yet," said Wittman. "Really strict tests of the theory
>will come in the next few years as astronomers measure the [weak] lensing
>more and more accurately." "
The topic was dark matter, not the fate of the universe. Your
inability to comment is noted.
http://www.bell-labs.com/org/physicalsciences/projects/darkmatter/darkmatter.html
Learn something.
Hey, who are these people? Have they done any work? Lets take a look!
http://xxx.lanl.gov/find/astro-ph/1/AND+au:+tyson+abs:+lensing/0/1/0/2000,1999/0/1
Why, yes they have. Go play with those if the news article gets your
panties in a twist. Lensing is lensing.
>
>Don't be so emotionally attached to a model
>that you defend it with ad hominem like a religious zealot.
Oh you wound me so with such harsh words!
>
>As can be seen, the General Relativity industry/cult
>latches on to any artifact, and tries to twist it to
>promote their religiously and economically bias agenda.
It is called evidence, crackpotter. Obviously evidence does not give
any merit to a scientific theory in your compactified dementia.
>
>General Relativity is a Tower of Babel,
>that generates more heat than light,
>and wastes time, money and minds,
>on speculation about time travel, worm holes,
>warped space, gravity waves, etc.
>
>As can be seen from the article,
>hundreds of millions of dollars
>are wasted promoting the agenda of a small cult,
>and speculating about places and events
>that lie far, far beyond the reaches of man
>in time and spaces, great and small.
>
>A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
...and we have come full circle. You live on a Mobius strip of
stupidity, it seems. No matter where you start or which path you take,
you always end up where you began - as shown by your above speil.
- Next message: No Way: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Previous message: David Kastrup: "Re: Self-teaching of integration methods"
- In reply to: Tom Potter: "Re: About the evidence and relativity"
- Next in thread: Tom Potter: "Re: About the evidence and relativity"
- Reply: Tom Potter: "Re: About the evidence and relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]