Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?
From: Lance Lamboy (lance.lamboy_at_lamboy.nospam.com)
Date: 08/01/04
- Next message: David McAnally: "Internal Set Theory Uniqueness Principle"
- Previous message: John Savard: "Re: chess"
- In reply to: No Way: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Next in thread: Christian Bau: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 12:21:49 -0400
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:39:41 +0200, No Way wrote:
<snip>
>>I further noted that you can find a formula for 5 that gives the count
>>of primes that are odd that do not have 3 as a factor that have 5 as a
>>factor,
>
> Primes? With five as a factor? Is this some new definition of a prime
> number or am I missing something obvious?
I think you are missing the obvious. 5 is a prime number that has 5 as a
factor. Now can you determine the number of primes that have 23 as a
factor?
<snip>
-- Lance Lamboy "Go F*ck Yourself" ~ *** Cheney
- Next message: David McAnally: "Internal Set Theory Uniqueness Principle"
- Previous message: John Savard: "Re: chess"
- In reply to: No Way: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Next in thread: Christian Bau: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]