Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?
From: Christian Bau (christian.bau_at_cbau.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 08/01/04
- Next message: Stephen J. Herschkorn: "Re: Probability & Statistics"
- Previous message: Christian Bau: "Re: Strange relations, number theory tidbit"
- In reply to: No Way: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Next in thread: Lance Lamboy: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Reply: Lance Lamboy: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Reply: David Kastrup: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:58:09 +0100
In article <kq0qg0tgeqqigq0qodukfv3b66s7kmmcjc@4ax.com>,
No Way <Not@real.com> wrote:
> On 30 Jul 2004 13:46:34 -0700, jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote:
>
> >I further noted that you can find a formula for 5 that gives the count
> >of primes that are odd that do not have 3 as a factor that have 5 as a
> >factor,
>
> Primes? With five as a factor? Is this some new definition of a prime
> number or am I missing something obvious?
Here is a C function that returns the number of primes <= N that have
five as a factor:
int primes_le_N_with_factor_5 (int N) { return N >= 5; }
- Next message: Stephen J. Herschkorn: "Re: Probability & Statistics"
- Previous message: Christian Bau: "Re: Strange relations, number theory tidbit"
- In reply to: No Way: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Next in thread: Lance Lamboy: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Reply: Lance Lamboy: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Reply: David Kastrup: "Re: More number theory tidbits, paper?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]