Re: Dimensions of Array
From: Darren E. Mason (stcalvin_at_comcast.net)
Date: 08/04/04
- Next message: Stephen A. Meigs: "Re: Internal Set Theory Uniqueness Principle"
- Previous message: C. Bond: "Re: Computational complexity, number theory tidbits"
- In reply to: Tim Brauch: "Dimensions of Array"
- Next in thread: William Elliot: "Re: Dimensions of Array"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 15:06:00 GMT
The standard is to refer to a matrix/array as an m x n array, where m is the
number of rows and n is the number of columns. So in your case, that would
be
a 3 x 4 array.
Darren E. Mason
"Tim Brauch" <RnEeMwOs.pVoEst@tbrauch.cNOoSPAMm> wrote in message
news:sat1h0hakg11nl77lu222iqjrtd1874gh9@4ax.com...
> What would you say are the dimensions of the following array:
>
> * * * *
> * * * *
> * * * *
>
> I am working with 4th and 5th grade teachers as part of an NSF GK-12
> fellowship. One of my roles is that of a "professional mathematician"
> to answer questions the teachers have about math.
>
> In the 4th grade text the array is named in ROWxCOLUMN format (the same
> way the dimensions of matrices are labelled). The above array would be
> 3x4. In the 5th grade text, arrays are named by the ACROSSxUP format
> (similar to cartesian coordinates) and the above array would be a 4x3.
>
> The teachers are trying to be consistent and want to know which method
> they should model. I told them to be sure to explain to the kids that
> with either convention, a 3x4 and 4x3 array are congruent or similar,
> but not quite equal.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> --
> Timothy M. Brauch
> NSF Fellow
> Department of Mathematics
> University of Louisville
>
> email is:
> news (dot) post (at) tbrauch (dot) com
>
-- submissions: post to k12.ed.math or e-mail to k12math@k12groups.org private e-mail to the k12.ed.math moderator: kem-moderator@k12groups.org newsgroup website: http://www.thinkspot.net/k12math/ newsgroup charter: http://www.thinkspot.net/k12math/charter.html
- Next message: Stephen A. Meigs: "Re: Internal Set Theory Uniqueness Principle"
- Previous message: C. Bond: "Re: Computational complexity, number theory tidbits"
- In reply to: Tim Brauch: "Dimensions of Array"
- Next in thread: William Elliot: "Re: Dimensions of Array"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|