Re: random numbers and statistics
From: Jürgen R. (jurgenr_at_web.de)
Date: 08/09/04
- Next message: Alex Hunsley: "Re: Fractals"
- Previous message: William Elliot: "Re: "Z -> z versus Z -> z e" - sole thread for future discussion/postings"
- In reply to: flip: "Re: random numbers and statistics"
- Next in thread: Herman Rubin: "Re: random numbers and statistics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 11:14:53 GMT
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:28:02 -0700, "flip" <flip_alpha@safebunch.com>
wrote:
>
>"sean kim" <sean_incali@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:4d47f9d3.0408061611.7a4436c@posting.google.com...
>> Hello group,
>>
>> I'm doing soem simulations using random numbers, and i wanted to do
>> statistics on the results of nuemrical calculations that were done
>> using random number inputs.
>>
>> It's basically perturbation analysis with random and finite
>> perturbations to the input parameters. then i'm looking at the
>> fluctuations of values of a given output due the perturbations.
>>
>> Naturally, since the numbers are not really random, but pseudorandom,
>> I'm wondering if the pseudo random generator will show false
>> correlations if i look at thing like the mean, variance and standard
>> deviations of the output.
>>
>> Am I right in worrying about this? or anyone has some insights they
>> are graciously willing to provide?
>>
>>
>> Thanks all in advance
>>
>> sean
>
>I would recommend using a suite of PRNGs like ICGs, MT, SWB, AWC, Mother of
>all RNGs and others when doing your simulations and analyses.
>
>Also, you could try using DIEHARD and rigbeto analyze the PRNGs. Look to
>NIST (http://csrc.nist.gov/rng/rng2.html) and RaBiGeTe
>(http://www.webalice.it/cristiano.pi/rabigete/)
>
>You could look to cryptographic PRNGs and RNGs as they have rather stringent
>requirements (see NIST).
>
>Lastly, you could look to hardware RNGs like comscire and others.
And having 'looked to' all these XGYNT's won't he be too dizzy to do
his job?
>
>HTH, Flip
>
>
>
- Next message: Alex Hunsley: "Re: Fractals"
- Previous message: William Elliot: "Re: "Z -> z versus Z -> z e" - sole thread for future discussion/postings"
- In reply to: flip: "Re: random numbers and statistics"
- Next in thread: Herman Rubin: "Re: random numbers and statistics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|